Thursday, October 15, 2009
Ch. 11/12 Case Study
Ch. 4/5 Case Study
Ch. 10 case study
Ch. 9 Case Study
I would think that it is operant conditioning just becuase a response increases or fear as a result of being followed by a reinforcement or the man. It could be that she has been beaten by a man or something along those lines. Classical would be more a new response is acquired as a result of 2 stimuli that are presented at the same time. I do not feel this is the case.
- promote generalization of new responses (what is her favorite 2 colors for today), point out similarities among different situations (such as her being her own person not her sister), emphasize differences (one tree is pine, another spruce), use positive reinforcement (wow you did an amazing job writing your name today), give immediate praise for appropriate behavior (thank you for walking in the hall not running), use concrete reinforcer (stickers for praise, lots of smiles).
-describe desired behaviors clearly (I want you to walk not run in the hall), give precise feedback regarding behavior( you did great in sharing that toy), make sure she understands all of the rules and what the consequence is for breaking that rule such as a letter home, a phone call home, extra homework etc.
Ch. 7/8 case study
Questions:
1. Describe two similarities between the traditional lesson and the constructivist one as described above.
-The students all took part in the measurement, just the understanding was different
-they were both based upon information in which the students knew nothing about so far in there life
2. What are two benefits and two drawbacks of the constructivist approach as described above? Why? In your opinion, are the benefits worth the costs? Explain your response.
-the students are learning the information by using critical thinking skills,
-all of the students are engaged and can have fun with this activity because in a sense they are in charge
-one drawback is that it's kind of like the blind leading the blind, they do not understand what measurment is so they're kind of just fishing and hoping
-another drawback could be time, this way uses a lot more time than say if it was the traditional way.
The benefits are worth the cost of time and other possibilities just because it gives the students great skills for future use. By allowing the students to "team" together and come up with possible ideas it really enables the critical thinking to occur. I think that having a good combination of traditional and constructivism is great because it will keep order and engage the students.
3. How does the constructivist lesson described above promote critical thinking? Give specific examples of critical thinking from the case study to support your response.
-it allows the students to make connections (really think) such as tommy did with his height, it allows that child to make a real life connection and also will help with problem solving.
-Just like mark had seen or heard of the horse hands for measurements he tried the same thing, used higher order thinking to solve a problem.
No it would not because the idea of authentic comes from a very traditional classroom and having the teacher tell what is the correct information.
Ch. 6 case study
Case 2: Mr. Dunkin and Mr. Richards, teachers at the same school, are debating in the teacher’s lounge about who provides the best type of organization for the students’ learning. Mr. Dunkin lectures and assigns reading and chapter problems Mondays through Thursdays. On Fridays he gives a short answer exam. In Mr. Richards’ class the students never know what will take place on any given day until they arrive in class and look at a detailed outline of the hour’s activities on the chalkboard. His class engages in mix of role-plays, lecture, videos, group projects and demonstrations. Mr. Richards occasionally gives surprise quizzes and his unit tests can include true/false, multiple choice, short answer, or essay.
4. Who do you think provides better instruction for his students? Support your answer from an information processing perspective. Well I actually think that Mr. Richards has a better instruction for his students just because he engages the students and has a detailed outline of the activities for that day on the caulk board. I feel if you present the entire week schedule to the students it is likely they will have forgotten it by Friday.
5. How would you expect the students’ learning outcomes to differ depending on which teacher they had? Every student learns in a different way, in this situation the students would not "learn" different information. One class would know yes the great depression was caused by bad economy just as the other class would have learned. However they learned it in different ways, one teacher lectures, the other engages and invites the students to be involved in the learning. The involved students are more likely to use higher order thinking and make connects where as the lectured students are less likely to have that occurrence.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Review Contract# 2
Case Study #3
If you had a book that talked about a boy who stole some bread for his family and then realized it was wrong you can implement that into your classroom as well. You can help them to understand right from wrong using the books and the examples in the book which they can relate to.
Potential advantages to this strategy is it is someone that they look up to or trust. So whatever he says they will see as being "right". It does not single out someone in the classroom either. Based upon Eriksons and Vgotskys theories it is important for the students to trust and go through each stage in life. By using this letter that has been supposedly written by Mr. Stone there friend the students continue building the trust and also achieve a sense of competence.
